Useful to God (part 2)
teacher's guide Lesson 7

Lesson Seven

John: The Man Who Wished to Rain Fire

Texts: Luke 9:51-56 and 1 John 3:13-24

The objective of this lesson: to challenge people to understand God's purpose (goal) is universal, not national. When people make God's goal national, they distort God's goal. We (humans) do not determine God's purposes.

People love to "flex their muscles." Generally speaking, people love to confirm they have power. It seems that by demonstrating power we (a) confirm to ourselves our self worth and (b) assure our safety from others. Though we often do not think much about why we are so drawn to power, many people seek to demonstrate power at other people's expense.

Power (in and out of the church) intoxicates a lot of people. Possession of power draws lots of people, especially when we seek to exercise control. We are deceived into thinking the key to God's objective is force rather than faith.

One of the incredible things about Jesus: He possessed incredible power, yet he did not use his power to destroy but to help. He refused to use his access to power to benefit himself at strategic moments when (from a human perspective) it would have seemed he should have used his power to control the situation (consider John 18:33-37 and Matthew 16:47-56).

Jesus did not use the power available to him to address adverse personal situations--like deliver himself from his trials or from his crucifixion. Do not say he never benefited from his power. He did if he drank the wine when he turned water to wine, or if he ate on the occasions when he fed the multitudes. He did when he stilled the storm and when he walked on water. However, he never averted God's purpose by using power to circumvent God's purpose.

A striking contrast is provided by the same man in the texts of this lesson. In the first, John is a young disciple following Jesus before Jesus died. In the second John is an old disciple who has belonged to Jesus for years--long after Jesus died. John's understanding of the meaning of Messiah in the first text did not "get it." John's understanding of the meaning of Messiah in the second text is completely different. He (for a long time) "got it." This lesson is devoted to grasping the difference.

When John was young and Jesus was not yet crucified, John saw power as a means of punishing people who disappointed him. When John was older and Jesus (for years) was the resurrected one, John understood that the means of influencing others was found in an uncommon love, not in the power of punishment. It is not being afraid of punishment that best reveals God, but allowing God to transform the person we are, the person who is a blessing and not a threat.

Begin by considering John's basic concept in the first text which occurred before Jesus' death. The Jewish concept of Messiah (God's promise to the Jewish people/nation) was basically this: God promised He would send a Messiah (Christ) to rescue them (see Genesis 12:3b and Galatians 3:8, 16). Through time, the Jewish people viewed themselves as God's objective (the end-result of His purposes), rather than a means (or vehicle) to God's purposes. (When any group sees themselves as God's objective rather than God's vehicle to His objective, the group easily becomes God's obstacle rather than God's assistants who help achieve God's objective. God's objective involves more than one nation. It is the salvation of people [John 3:16; Roman 5:8; Ephesians 2:1-10], eternal life for people, living with God in heaven.)

John's reaction to the Samaritans who rejected Jesus was determined by John's concept of what King Messiah would be. Anytime a group sees themselves as God's objective instead of God's assistants available to God to help achieve God's objectives, they are easily deceived, readily become an obstacle to God's objectives, and become part of "the problem" instead of part of "the solution." The deception is the result of distorting God's objectives.

John's first view was fashioned more by his culture than his association with Jesus. A number of Jewish views existed about exactly "how" God would send the Messiah and "what" Messiah would do. Many of those views incorporated two key elements: (a) Messiah would be a King over the Jewish nation, and (b) Messiah would rid the Jewish nation of its enemies. Obviously, there easily could be numerous variations in what was meant by being a king, and numerous variations involved in freeing the Jewish nation from enemies. However, expectations were associated with their concepts of being a successful king. For John that basically meant (a) that he (John) would be an administrator/advisor to Jesus when Jesus ruled the Jewish nation and (b) he would be in a position of power as a man of power because he had access to the ear of the king.

The challenge all Christians face: allowing God to declare His objectives rather than deciding for God what His objectives should be. Often, spiritually, our expectations become our stumbling blocks, especially when our expectations are radically different from God's objectives. It is difficult for us to understand how much God loves people.

So, if that was John's basic concept of Jesus ruling as king, how did he show loyalty to Jesus? After all, he must be loyal to the potential king!

John may have been more interested in demonstrating personal loyalty than getting Jesus to Jerusalem.

Look carefully at the first text (Luke 9:51-56). First, note strongly held (believed) expectations are powerful concepts that effect what is heard and disregarded, and believed and discounted. What Jesus said to some of the twelve and to all the twelve did not fit their expectations of Messiah (9:9-27). Yet, Messiah had to be what they expected, not what Jesus said. Second, note Jesus was on a determined personal mission. He was headed to Jerusalem to meet his ultimate purpose. Whereas he was going to die and be resurrected (and he knew it!), John thought Jesus was going to be King of the Jewish nation as John thought of being king. Third, notice Jesus made advanced preparations. He and his group planned to spend the night in a Samaritan village (unnamed). This is not the first time Jesus had contact with a Samaritan village (remember John 4:1-43?). Fourth, note the village refused to provide places for Jesus and the twelve to stay. The reason given: Jesus was concerned about getting to Jerusalem. The Samaritan village was not his destination, but Jerusalem. Do not forget the hostile feelings Samaritans had toward Jews and Jews had toward the Samaritans. Jewish attitudes of superiority and supremacy provoked Samaritan reactions. Fifth, note John's (and James') reaction. (To affirm James' and John's political views of their concept of Messiah, see Matthew 20:20-24.)

It is amazing what we can "tune out" and refuse to hear when we do not wish to understand. Wonder how many times in a marriage someone has said, "But I told you!" Wonder how many times a husband or wife responded, "Is that what you meant?"

The reaction of John and his brother, James, was one of punishment. How dare this Samaritan village refuse the future King of Israel a place to stay! The only appropriate response was retaliation! These horrible Samaritans needed to be taught a lesson! So, "Lord, you have been snubbed by these ungrateful people! What would you have us do? Command fire to come from heaven and consume them?" Notice they were confident they could command the fire to come. They thought it was a response that would meet with Jesus' approval.

They said what they were confident Jesus wanted to hear. They thought they had King Jesus figured out, and in truth they completely missed the point. No wonder Jesus called James and John "the sons of thunder" (Mark 3:17).

Jesus' response is astounding! He rebuked James and John--not the village of the Samaritans! Jesus took no offense! James and John were the ones who did not "get it!"

This would have been an amazing, unexpected response. They thought they were pleasing Jesus when they actually irritated Jesus!

In the second text, years after Jesus' death, John (this same man!) underscored the value of and the importance of love. He said the contrast between good and evil, righteous wills and wills motivated by hate, was (is) love. The contrast between Christians and people who do not believe in Jesus as God's Christ will not be seen in knowledge, but in love. John finally "got it!"

The objective of Jesus' life and death was to save people from the danger of their sins, not to destroy them because they fell to sin. Read John 3:16-21 again.

It is almost too simple for Christians to conclude that everything would be "okay" if we could just exercise the right "control." It is too easy to think we could "fix" everything if we could just exercise the "right power" so that the "right people" were punished and paid the full consequences for misdeeds. Jesus disagreed. Christians exist to invest themselves in God's objective of saving people through helping people. Leave the eternal judging to God--that is His business. Our business is to invest ourselves in helping others as we seek the salvation of all.

Help your students understand salvation is not a control issue, but a "helping people live in Jesus Christ" issue by allowing God to turn us into a people of compassionate love (just as He is!).

For Thought and Discussion

  1. Generally speaking, people love to confirm what? Why?

    People love to confirm they have power. They love to do so (a) to confirm the self worth and (b) to assure their safety.

  2. Discuss (as given in this lesson) one of the incredible things about Jesus.

    The discussion should include this fact: Jesus did not subvert God's purposes by using power.

  3. How does John prove us a striking contrast in this lesson?

    In the first text he wanted to destroy people. In the second he urged love for people.

  4. Through time, the Jewish people saw themselves as what rather than what?

    They saw themselves as God's objective (the end-result of His purposes) rather than a vehicle (a means to serve) to God's purposes.

  5. How was John's first view fashioned?

    It was fashioned more by culture (what others had long expected) rather than association with Jesus.

  6. As John tried to show loyalty to Jesus in Luke 9:51-56, what 5 things are you asked to note in that scripture?

    1. The power of expectations.
    2. Jesus was on a determined, personal mission.
    3. Jesus made advanced preparations.
    4. The Samaritan village refused to provide for Jesus and the twelve.
    5. John's reaction.

  7. What was John's reaction to the rejection of the Samaritan village?

    He wanted to punish the village by raining fire on it.

  8. What was Jesus' response to John's request to send fire on the Samaritan village?

    Jesus rebuked James and John.

  9. Contrast the John in the first text with John's message in the second text.

    It is the contrast between good and evil, between righteous wills and wills motivated by hate.

  10. What lessons should Christians learn from this?

    It is too simple for Christians to conclude that control will make everything okay. It is too easy to think that power can fix things. Christianity is an investment of self in God's objective. God's objective is to save people.


Link to Student Guide Lesson 7

Copyright © 2008
David Chadwell & West-Ark Church of Christ

previous lesson | table of contents | next lesson